Friends of Free Wildlife × UpClose Consulting Workshop FFW2026 · 21 July 2026

What thirty-two of you told us.

The pre-workshop diagnostic, presented as the group's collective picture — nine dimensions, scored for how well FFW performs and how much each one matters.

32Participants
4 + 1Board + Coordinator
27Volunteers
9Dimensions
+3.66Largest gap
Section 1

Group average — performance by dimension

Each bar is the average performance score across all 32 respondents. The gold marker shows the average importance the group assigned — the distance between bar and marker is the gap. Tap the i for the insight and the question it raises for today.

Group performance (avg / 10)
Importance (avg / 10)
Red chip = gap ≥ 3.0
Section 2

Where the groups see it differently

The same 1–10 performance scale, showing where the workshop group (board + coordinator, gold diamond) and the volunteers (sage triangle) each land on average. The wider the band between the markers, the more differently the two groups experience that dimension. Sorted largest divergence first.

Board + Coordinator avg
Volunteer avg
Δ = workshop group minus volunteers
Section 3

Priority matrix — performance vs importance

Every dimension plotted by performance (across) and importance (up). Hover any numbered dot to preview it; click to pin its full detail — scores, group split, the insight and the key question for the room.

Group average (numbered)
Board + Coordinator
Volunteers
Hover to preview · click to pin · click again to release

Hover or tap a dimension on the matrix to see its full detail here.